Creation Zone

  • Subscribe to our RSS feed.
  • Twitter
  • StumbleUpon
  • Reddit
  • Facebook
  • Digg

Sunday, 30 June 2013

Solaris Tips : Assembler, Format, File Descriptors, Ciphers & Mount Points

Posted on 00:27 by Unknown

1. Most Oracle software installers need assembler

Assembler (as) is not installed by default on Solaris 11.
     Find and install

eg.,

# pkg search assembler
INDEX ACTION VALUE PACKAGE
pkg.fmri set solaris/developer/assembler pkg:/developer/assembler@0.5.11-0.175.1.5.0.3.0

# pkg install pkg:/developer/assembler

Assembler binary used to be under /usr/ccs/bin directory on Solaris 10 and prior versions.
     There is no /usr/ccs/bin on Solaris 11. Contents were moved to /usr/bin



2. Non-interactive retrieval of the entire list of disks that format reports

If the format utility cannot show the entire list of disks in a single screen on stdout, it shows some and prompts user to - hit space for more or s to select - to move to the next screen to show few more disks. Run the following command(s) to retrieve the entire list of disks in a single shot.


format < /dev/null

-or-

echo "\n" | format


3. Finding system wide file descriptors/handles in use

Run the following kstat command as any user (privileged or non-privileged).


kstat -n file_cache -s buf_inuse

Going through /proc (process filesystem) is less efficient and may lead to inaccurate results due to the inclusion of duplicate file handles.



4. ssh connection to a Solaris 11 host fails with error Couldn't agree a client-to-server cipher (available: aes128-ctr,aes192-ctr,aes256-ctr,arcfour128,arcfour256,arcfour)

Solution: add 3des-cbc to the list of accepted ciphers to sshd configuration file.

Steps:

  1. Append the following line to /etc/ssh/sshd_config
    Ciphers aes128-ctr,aes192-ctr,aes256-ctr,arcfour128,arcfour256,arcfour,3des-cbc
  2. Restart ssh daemon
    svcadm -v restart ssh


5. UFS: Finding the last mount point for a device

fsck utility reports the last mountpoint on which the filesystem was mounted (it won't show the mount options though). The filesystem should be unmounted when running fsck.

eg.,

# fsck -n /dev/dsk/c0t5000CCA0162F7BC0d0s6
** /dev/rdsk/c0t5000CCA0162F7BC0d0s6 (NO WRITE)
** Last Mounted on /export/oracle
** Phase 1 - Check Blocks and Sizes
...
...
Read More
Posted in Oracle Solaris Tips | No comments

Friday, 31 May 2013

Oracle Internet Directory 11g Benchmark on SPARC T5

Posted on 16:44 by Unknown

SUMMARY

System Under Test (SUT)    Oracle's SPARC T5-2 server
Software    Oracle Internet Directory 11gR1-PS6
Target Load    50 million user entries
Reference URL    OID/T5 benchmark white paper

Oracle Internet Directory (OID) is an LDAP v3 Directory Server that has multi-threaded, multi-process, multi-instance process architecture with Oracle database as the directory store.

BENCHMARK WORKLOAD DESCRIPTION

Five test scenarios were executed in this benchmark - each test scenario performing a different type of LDAP operation. The key metrics are throughput -- the number of operations completed per second, and latency -- the time it took in milliseconds to complete an operation.

TEST SCENARIOS & RESULTS

1. LDAP Search operation : search for and retrieve specific entries from the directory

In this test scenario, each LDAP search operation matches a single unique entry. Each Search operation results in the lookup of an entry in such a way that no client looks up the same entry twice and no two clients lookup the same entry, and all entries are looked-up randomly.

#clientsThroughput
Operations/Second
Latency
milliseconds
1,000944,6241.05

2. LDAP Add operation : add entries, their object classes, attributes and values to the directory

In this test scenario, 16 concurrent LDAP clients added 500,000 entries of object class InetOrgPerson with 21 attributes to the directory.

#clientsThroughput
Operations/Second
Latency
milliseconds
161,00015.95

3. LDAP Compare operation : compare a given attribute value to the attribute value in a directory entry

In this test scenario, userpassword attribute was compared. That is, each LDAP Compare operation matches user password of a user.

#clientsThroughput
Operations/Second
Latency
milliseconds
1,000594,4261.68

4. LDAP Modify operation : add, delete or replace attributes for entries

In this test scenario, 50 concurrent LDAP clients updated a unique entry each time and a total of 50 million entries were updated. Attribute that is being modified was not indexed

#clientsThroughput
Operations/Second
Latency
milliseconds
5016,7352.98

5. LDAP Authentication operation : authenticates the credentials of a user

In this test scenario, 1000 concurrent LDAP clients authenticated 50 million users.

#clientsThroughput
Operations/Second
Latency
milliseconds
1,000305,3073.27

BONUS: LDAP Mixed operations Test

In this test scenario, 1000 LDAP clients were used to perform LDAP Search, Bind and Modify operations concurrently.
Operation breakdown (load distribution): Search: 65%. Bind: 30%. Modify: 5%

LDAP Operation#clientsThroughput
Operations/Second
Latency
milliseconds
Search650188,8323.86
Bind30087,1591.08
Modify5014,52812

And finally, the:

HARDWARE CONFIGURATION

 1 x Oracle SPARC T5-2 Server
    » 2 x 3.6 GHz SPARC T5 sockets each with 16 Cores (Total Cores: 32) and 8 MB L3 cache
    » 512 GB physical memory
    » 2 x 10 GbE cards
    » 1 x Sun Storage F5100 Flash Array with 80 flash modules
    » Oracle Solaris 11.1 operating system

ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS

Major credit goes to our colleague, Ramaprakash Sathyanarayan

Read More
Posted in Oracle OID LDAP SPARC T5 T5-2 Benchmark | No comments

Friday, 12 April 2013

Siebel 8.1.1.4 Benchmark on SPARC T5

Posted on 02:14 by Unknown

Hardly six months after announcing Siebel 8.1.1.4 benchmark results on Oracle SPARC T4 servers, we have a brand new set of Siebel 8.1.1.4 benchmark results on Oracle SPARC T5 servers. There are no updates to the Siebel benchmark kit in the last couple years - so, we continued to use the Siebel 8.1.1.4 benchmark workload to measure the performance of Siebel Financial Services Call Center and Order Management business transactions on the recently announced SPARC T5 servers.

Benchmark Details

The latest Siebel 8.1.1.4 benchmark was executed on a mix of SPARC T5-2, SPARC T4-2 and SPARC T4-1 servers. The benchmark test simulated the actions of a large corporation with 40,000 concurrent active users. To date, this is the highest user count we achieved in a Siebel benchmark.

User Load Breakdown & Achieved Throughput

Siebel Application Module%Total Load#UsersBusiness Trx per Hour
Financial Services Call Center7028,000273,786
Order Management3012,00059,553
Total    10040,000333,339

Average Transaction Response Times for both Financial Services Call Center and Order Management transactions were under one second.

Software & Hardware Specification

 Test ComponentSoftwareVersionServer ModelServer QtyPer Server SpecificationOS
Chips Cores vCPUs CPU Speed CPU Type Memory
Application ServerSiebel8.1.1.4SPARC T5-222322563.6 GHzSPARC-T5512 GBSolaris 10 1/13 (S10U11)
Database ServerOracle 11g R211.2.0.2SPARC T4-212161282.85 GHzSPARC-T4256 GBSolaris 10 8/11 (S10U10)
Web ServeriPlanet Web Server7.0.9 (7 U9)SPARC T4-1118642.85 GHzSPARC-T4128 GBSolaris 10 8/11 (S10U10)
Load GeneratorOracle Application Test Suite9.21.0043SunFire X420012442.6 GHzAMD Opteron 285 SE16 GBWindows 2003 R2 SP2
Load Drivers (Agents)Oracle Application Test Suite9.21.0043SunFire X41708212122.93 GHzIntel Xeon X5670 48 GBWindows 2003 R2 SP2

Additional Notes:

  • Siebel Gateway Server was configured to run on one of the application server nodes
  • Four Siebel application servers were configured in the Siebel Enterprise to handle 40,000 concurrent users
    • - Each SPARC T5-2 was configured to run two Siebel application server instances
    • - Each of the Siebel application server instances on SPARC T5-2 servers were separated using Solaris virtualization technology, Zones
    • - 40,000 concurrent user sessions were load balanced across all four Siebel application server instances
  • Siebel database was hosted on a Sun Storage F5100 Flash Array consisting 80 x 24 GB flash modules (FMODs)
    • - Siebel 8.1.1.4 benchmark workload is not I/O intensive and does not require flash storage for better I/O performance
  • Fourteen iPlanet Web Server virtual servers were configured with Siebel Web Server Extension (SWSE) plug-in to handle 40,000 concurrent user load
    • - All fourteen iPlanet Web Server instances forwarded HTTP requests from Siebel clients to all four Siebel application server instances in a round robin fashion
  • Oracle Application Test Suite (OATS) was stable and held up amazingly well over the entire duration of the test run.
    • - The test ran for more than five hours including a three hour ramp up state
    • - While we are at it, do not forget to check the Oracle Application Testing Suite (OATS): Few Tips & Tricks page
  • The benchmark test results were validated and thoroughly audited by the Siebel benchmark and PSR teams
    • - Nothing new here. All Sun published Siebel benchmarks including the SPARC T4 one were properly audited before releasing those to the outside world

Resource Utilization

Component#UsersCPU%Memory Footprint
Gateway/Application Server20,00067.03205.54 GB
Application Server20,00066.09206.24 GB
Database Server40,00033.43108.72 GB
Web Server40,00029.4814.03 GB

Finally, how does this benchmark stack up against other published benchmarks? Short answer is "very well". Head over to the Oracle Siebel Benchmark White Papers webpage to do the comparison yourself.


[Credit to our hard working colleagues in SAE, Siebel PSR, benchmark and Oracle Platform Integration (OPI) teams. Special thanks to Sumti Jairath and Venkat Krishnaswamy for the last minute fire drill]

Read More
Posted in Oracle Siebel Sun SPARC T5 Benchmark T5-2 | No comments

Tuesday, 5 March 2013

SuperCluster Best Practices : Deploying Oracle 11g Database in Zones

Posted on 23:47 by Unknown

To be clear, this post is about a white paper that's been out there for more than two months. Access it through the following url.

  Best Practices for Deploying Oracle Solaris Zones with Oracle Database 11g on SPARC SuperCluster

The focus of the paper is on databases and zones. On SuperCluster, customers have the choice of running their databases in logical domains that are dedicated to running Oracle Database 11g R2. With exclusive access to Exadata Storage Servers, those domains are aptly called "Database" domains. If the requirement mandates, it is possible to create and use all logical domains as "database domains" or "application domains" or a mix of those. Since the focus is on databases, the paper talks only about the database domains and how zones can be created, configured and used within each database domain for fine grained control over multiple databases consolidated in a SuperCluster environment.

When multiple databases are being consolidated (including RAC databases) in database logical domains, zones are one of the options that fulfill requirements such as the fault, operation, network, security and resource isolation, multiple RAC instances in a single logical domain, separate identity and independent manageability for database instances.

The best practices cover the following topics. Some of those are applicable to standalone, non-engineered environments as well.

Solaris Zones

  • CPU, memory and disk space allocation
  • Zone Root on Sun ZFS Storage Appliance
  • Network configuration
  • Use of DISM
  • Use of ZFS filesystem
  • SuperCluster specific zone deployment tool, ssc_exavm
  • ssctuner utility

Oracle Database

  • Exadata Storage Grid (Disk Group) Configuration
  • Disk Group Isolation
    • Shared Storage approach
    • Dedicated Storage Server approach
  • Resizing Grid Disks

Oracle RAC Configuration
Securing the Databases, and

Example Database Consolidation Scenarios

  • Consolidation example using Half-Rack SuperCluster
  • Consolidation example using Full-Rack SuperCluster

Acknowledgements

A large group of experts reviewed the material and provided quality feedback. Hence they deserve credit for their work and time. Listed below are some of those reviewers (sincere apologies if I missed listing any major contributors).

Kesari Mandyam, Binoy Sukumaran, Gowri Suserla, Allan Packer, Jennifer Glore, Hazel Alabado, Tom Daly, Krishnan Shankar, Gurubalan T, Rich long, Prasad Bagal, Lawrence To, Rene Kundersma, Raymond Dutcher, David Brean, Jeremy Ward, Suzi McDougall, Ken Kutzer, Larry Mctintosh, Roger Bitar, Mikel Manitius

Read More
Posted in SuperCluster Oracle Database RDBMS RAC Solaris Zones | No comments

Tuesday, 12 February 2013

OBIEE 11g Benchmark on SPARC T4

Posted on 17:31 by Unknown

Just like the Siebel 8.1.x/SPARC T4 benchmark post, this one too was overdue for at least four months. In any case, I hope the Oracle BI customers already knew about the OBIEE 11g/SPARC T4 benchmark effort. In here I will try to provide few additional / interesting details that aren't covered in the following Oracle PR that was posted on oracle.com on 09/30/2012.

    SPARC T4 Server Delivers Outstanding Performance on Oracle Business Intelligence Enterprise Edition 11g


Benchmark Details

System Under Test

The entire BI middleware stack including the WebLogic 11g Server, OBI Server, OBI Presentation Server and Java Host was installed and configured on a single SPARC T4-4 server consisting four 8-Core 3.0 GHz SPARC T4 processors (total #cores: 32) and 128 GB physical memory. Oracle Solaris 10 8/11 is the operating system.

BI users were authenticated against Oracle Internet Directory (OID) in this benchmark - hence OID software which was part of Oracle Identity Management 11.1.1.6.0 was also installed and configured on the system under test (SUT). Oracle BI Server's Query Cache was turned on, and as a result, most of the query results were cached in OBIS layer, that resulted in minimal database activity making it ideal to have the Oracle 11g R2 database server with the OBIEE database running on the same box as well.

Oracle BI database was hosted on a Sun ZFS Storage 7120 Appliance. The BI Web Catalog was under a ZFS/zpool on a couple of SSDs.


Test Scenario

In this benchmark, 25000 concurrent users assumed five different business user roles -- Marketing Executive, Sales Representative, Sales Manager, Sales Vice-president, and Service Manager. The load was distributed equally among those five business user roles. Each of those different BI users accessed five different pre-built dashboards with each dashboard having an average of five reports - a mix of charts, tables and pivot tables - and returning 50-500 rows of aggregated data. The benchmark test scenario included drilling down into multiple levels from a table or chart within a dashboard. There is a 60 second think time between requests, per user.


BI Setup & Test Results

OBIEE 11g 11.1.1.6.0 was deployed on SUT in a vertical scale-out fashion. Two Oracle BI Presentation Server processes, one Oracle BI Server process, one Java Host process and two instances of WebLogic Managed Servers handled 25,000 concurrent user sessions smoothly. This configuration resulted in a sub-second overall average transaction response time (average of averages over a duration of 120 minutes or 2 hours). On average, 450 business transactions were executed per second, which triggered 750 SQL executions per second.

It took only 52% of CPU on average (~5% system CPU and rest in user land) to do all this work to achieve the throughput outlined above. Since 25,000 unique test/BI users hammered different dashboards consistently, not so surprisingly bulk of the CPU was spent in Oracle BI Presentation Server layer, which took a whopping 29%. BI Server consumed about 10-11% and the rest was shared by Java Host, OID, WebLogic Managed Server instances and the Oracle database.


So, what is the key take away from this whole exercise?

SPARC T4 rocks Oracle BI world. OBIEE 11g/SPARC T4 is an ideal combination that may work well for majority of OBIEE deployments on Solaris platform. Or in marketing jargon - The excellent vertical and horizontal scalability of the SPARC T4 server gives customer the option to scale up as well as scale out growth, to support large BI EE installations, with minimal hardware investment.

Evaluate and decide for yourself.

[Credit to our colleagues in Oracle FMW PSR, ISVe teams and SCA lab support engineers]
Read More
Posted in Oracle Business+Intelligence Analytics Solaris SPARC T4 | No comments

Sunday, 3 February 2013

[Tip] Samsung Galaxy S II: Turning off Camera Shutter Sound

Posted on 11:43 by Unknown

It is one of the hot topics among Galaxy S II users. In web forums, some of the recurring solutions appear to be rooting the phone or muting the "system" sounds. They seem to work in some cases. However there is a much simpler solution for Galaxy S II phones running Ice Cream Sandwich (ICS) version of Android.

Steps:

  1. Launch the Camera application

  2. Tap the Menu key button to bring up "Edit Shortcuts" menu

  3. Tap "Edit Shortcuts" menu item to list out all available shortcuts

  4. Look for "Shutter sound" shortcut

  5. Press, hold and drag the "Shutter sound" option to one of the empty boxes shown on top. If there are no empty boxes, simply drop it on to one of the non-empty boxes that contain the least desired shortcut/option.

  6. Finally tap on "Shutter sound" icon and select the "Off" button to keep the camera shutter silent

PS:
Screenshots were captured using T-Mobile Samsung Galaxy S II (SGH-T989) device running Android 4.0.3

Read More
Posted in Smartphone Samsung Galaxy S2 Phone+Shutter Tip Android ICS | No comments

Wednesday, 30 January 2013

Siebel 8.1.1.4 Benchmark on SPARC T4

Posted on 16:50 by Unknown

Siebel is a multi-threaded native application that performs well on Oracle's T-series SPARC hardware. We have several versions of Siebel benchmarks published on previous generation T-series servers ranging from Sun Fire T2000 to Oracle SPARC T3-4. So, it is natural to see that tradition extended to the current genration SPARC T4 as well.

Benchmark Details

29,000 user Siebel 8.1.1.4 benchmark on a mix of SPARC T4-1 and T4-2 servers was announced during the Oracle OpenWorld 2012 event. In this benchmark, Siebel application server instances ran on three SPARC T4-2/Solaris 10 8/11 systems where as the Oracle database server 11gR2 was configured on a single SPARC T4-1/Solaris 11 11/11 system. Several iPlanet web server 7 U9 instances with the Siebel Web Plug-in (SWE) installed ran on one SPARC T4-1/Solaris 10 8/11 system. Siebel database was hosted on a single Sun Storage F5100 flash array consisting 80 flash modules (FMODs) each with capacity 24 GB.

Siebel Call Center and Order Management System are the modules that were tested in the benchmark. The benchmark workload had 70% of virtual users running Siebel Call Center transactions and the remaining 30% vusers running Siebel Order Management System transactions. This benchmark on T4 exhibited sub-second response times on average for both Siebel Call Center and Order Management System modules.

Load balancing at various layers including web and test client systems ensured near uniform load across all web and application server instances. All three Siebel application server systems consumed ~78% CPU on average. The database and web server systems consumed ~53% and ~18% CPU respectively.

All these details are supposed to be available in a standard Oracle|Siebel benchmark template - but for some reason, I couldn't find it on Oracle's Siebel Benchmark White Papers web page yet. Meanwhile check out the following PR that was posted on oracle.com on 09/28/2012.

    SPARC T4 Servers Set World Record on Siebel CRM 8.1.1.4 Benchmark

Looks like the large number of vusers (29,000 to be precise) sets this benchmark apart from the other benchmarks published with the same Siebel 8.1.1.4 benchmark workload.

[Credit to our colleagues in Siebel PSR, benchmark, SAE and ISVe teams]

Read More
Posted in Oracle Siebel Sun SPARC T4 Benchmark | No comments
Newer Posts Older Posts Home
Subscribe to: Posts (Atom)

Popular Posts

  • UNIX/Linux: File Permissions (chmod)
    A file's permissions are also known as its 'mode'; so to change them we need to use the 'chmod' command (change mode). T...
  • C/C++/Java: ++ unary operator
    #include <stdio.h> int main() { int i = 5, j = 5; int total = 0; total = ++i + j++; printf("\ntotal o...
  • C++: Virtual Function
    A virtual function allows derived classes to replace the implementation provided by the base class. The compiler makes sure the replacemen...
  • Achievement Award
    Got an Achievement Award/Certificate from Sun Microsystems, in recognition for my effort with Siebel Benchmark!! =:) Related post: http:...
  • C/C++: Structure Vs Union
    A structure is a collection of items of different types; and each data item will have its own memory location. Where as only one item withi...
  • Database: Oracle Server Architecture (overview)
    Oracle server consists of the following core components: 1) database(s) & 2) instance(s) 1) database consists of: 1) datafil...
  • Solaris/C/C++: Benefit(s) of Linker (symbol) Scoping
    Introduction By default, the static linker (ld) makes all ELF symbols global in scope. This means it puts the symbols into the dynamic symbo...
  • Linux: Frozen Xwindows
    If Xwindows seem frozen, the following simple key strokes may bring back the Xserver without the need for a reboot Two ways to kill the Xwi...
  • PHP: Memory savings with mysqlnd
    mysqlnd may save memory. In the best cases, it may consume only 50% memory as that of libmysql esp. when the client application does not mod...
  • Blast from the Past : The Weekend Playlist #3
    The 80s contd., The 80s witnessed the rise of fine talent - so, it is only fitting to dedicate another complete playlist for the 80s. Her...

Categories

  • 80s music playlist
  • bandwidth iperf network solaris
  • best
  • black friday
  • breakdown database groups locality oracle pmap sga solaris
  • buy
  • deal
  • ebiz ebs hrms oracle payroll
  • emca oracle rdbms database ORA-01034
  • friday
  • Garmin
  • generic+discussion software installer
  • GPS
  • how-to solaris mmap
  • impdp ora-01089 oracle rdbms solaris tips upgrade workarounds zombie
  • Magellan
  • music
  • Navigation
  • OATS Oracle
  • Oracle Business+Intelligence Analytics Solaris SPARC T4
  • oracle database flashback FDA
  • Oracle Database RDBMS Redo Flash+Storage
  • oracle database solaris
  • oracle database solaris resource manager virtualization consolidation
  • Oracle EBS E-Business+Suite SPARC SuperCluster Optimized+Solution
  • Oracle EBS E-Business+Suite Workaround Tip
  • oracle lob bfile blob securefile rdbms database tips performance clob
  • oracle obiee analytics presentation+services
  • Oracle OID LDAP ADS
  • Oracle OID LDAP SPARC T5 T5-2 Benchmark
  • oracle pls-00201 dbms_system
  • oracle siebel CRM SCBroker load+balancing
  • Oracle Siebel Sun SPARC T4 Benchmark
  • Oracle Siebel Sun SPARC T5 Benchmark T5-2
  • Oracle Solaris
  • Oracle Solaris Database RDBMS Redo Flash F40 AWR
  • oracle solaris rpc statd RPC troubleshooting
  • oracle solaris svm solaris+volume+manager
  • Oracle Solaris Tips
  • oracle+solaris
  • RDC
  • sale
  • Smartphone Samsung Galaxy S2 Phone+Shutter Tip Android ICS
  • solaris oracle database fmw weblogic java dfw
  • SuperCluster Oracle Database RDBMS RAC Solaris Zones
  • tee
  • thanksgiving sale
  • tips
  • TomTom
  • windows

Blog Archive

  • ▼  2013 (16)
    • ▼  December (3)
      • Blast from the Past : The Weekend Playlist #3
      • Measuring Network Bandwidth Using iperf
      • Blast from the Past : The Weekend Playlist #2
    • ►  November (2)
    • ►  October (1)
    • ►  September (1)
    • ►  August (1)
    • ►  July (1)
    • ►  June (1)
    • ►  May (1)
    • ►  April (1)
    • ►  March (1)
    • ►  February (2)
    • ►  January (1)
  • ►  2012 (14)
    • ►  December (1)
    • ►  November (1)
    • ►  October (1)
    • ►  September (1)
    • ►  August (1)
    • ►  July (1)
    • ►  June (2)
    • ►  May (1)
    • ►  April (1)
    • ►  March (1)
    • ►  February (1)
    • ►  January (2)
  • ►  2011 (15)
    • ►  December (2)
    • ►  November (1)
    • ►  October (2)
    • ►  September (1)
    • ►  August (2)
    • ►  July (1)
    • ►  May (2)
    • ►  April (1)
    • ►  March (1)
    • ►  February (1)
    • ►  January (1)
  • ►  2010 (19)
    • ►  December (3)
    • ►  November (1)
    • ►  October (2)
    • ►  September (1)
    • ►  August (1)
    • ►  July (1)
    • ►  June (1)
    • ►  May (5)
    • ►  April (1)
    • ►  March (1)
    • ►  February (1)
    • ►  January (1)
  • ►  2009 (25)
    • ►  December (1)
    • ►  November (2)
    • ►  October (1)
    • ►  September (1)
    • ►  August (2)
    • ►  July (2)
    • ►  June (1)
    • ►  May (2)
    • ►  April (3)
    • ►  March (1)
    • ►  February (5)
    • ►  January (4)
  • ►  2008 (34)
    • ►  December (2)
    • ►  November (2)
    • ►  October (2)
    • ►  September (1)
    • ►  August (4)
    • ►  July (2)
    • ►  June (3)
    • ►  May (3)
    • ►  April (2)
    • ►  March (5)
    • ►  February (4)
    • ►  January (4)
  • ►  2007 (33)
    • ►  December (2)
    • ►  November (4)
    • ►  October (2)
    • ►  September (5)
    • ►  August (3)
    • ►  June (2)
    • ►  May (3)
    • ►  April (5)
    • ►  March (3)
    • ►  February (1)
    • ►  January (3)
  • ►  2006 (40)
    • ►  December (2)
    • ►  November (6)
    • ►  October (2)
    • ►  September (2)
    • ►  August (1)
    • ►  July (2)
    • ►  June (2)
    • ►  May (4)
    • ►  April (5)
    • ►  March (5)
    • ►  February (3)
    • ►  January (6)
  • ►  2005 (72)
    • ►  December (5)
    • ►  November (2)
    • ►  October (6)
    • ►  September (5)
    • ►  August (5)
    • ►  July (10)
    • ►  June (8)
    • ►  May (9)
    • ►  April (6)
    • ►  March (6)
    • ►  February (5)
    • ►  January (5)
  • ►  2004 (36)
    • ►  December (1)
    • ►  November (5)
    • ►  October (12)
    • ►  September (18)
Powered by Blogger.

About Me

Unknown
View my complete profile